Committee of Supreme Council Does Not Support Privatization of Pochaiv Monastery

23 September 2011, 10:47 | Temples, church property | 0 |   | Code for Blog |  | 

A special committee of the Supreme Council did not support the draft resolution to exclude the Pochaiv Monastery from the list of objects which are not subject to privatization. So reported a deputy of the Ternopil Regional Council, Stepan Barna to UNIANПочаївська-лавра.gif.

“I received a call from a deputy, Yaroslav Kendzior who is a member of the Committee on Culture and Spirituality of the Supreme Council of Ukraine. According to him, the special committee prohibited the exclusion of the Pochaiv Monastery from the list of objects which are not subject to privatization. Even the Communists were against it,” said Stepan Barna.

The bill regarding the exclusion of the monastery from the mentioned list was submitted by deputies Dmytro Shentsev (Party of Regions) and Yurii But (a member of the pro-regime deputy group “Reforms for the future”).

On 16 September, a draft address to the President, Parliament and government as to unacceptability of consideration of the bill on exclusion of the Pochaiv Monastery from the list of objects which are not subject to privatization was submitted to the consideration of the plenary session of Ternopil Regional Council.

However, the decision was not passed.

The faction of the All-Ukrainian Association Svoboda, which initiated the address, refused to participate in further activity of the session and left the hall expressing its protest. The session was then closed.

Система Orphus
Rating
0
1
0comments count

comments

add comments 

    Сan leave comments only to registered visitors Еnter

    Last comments

    • serge1717 | 22 February 2020, 20:56

      Думка верховного мокшанського гондона Українців НЕ ЦІКАВИТЬ!!!

    • velovs@ukr.net | 22 February 2020, 19:28

      ""В Україні Церква і держава розділені. Нещодавнє об'єднання православної Церкви України було виключно рішенням людей, що ініціюється конгрегацією відповідно до правил церкви і законодавчо

    • velovs@ukr.net | 22 February 2020, 19:13

      Сразу видно, какой Михаил, дескать, "христианин"... Т. е., по сути, он плохо знает (если вообще знает) Священное Писание. ------- Так вот: как раз относительно этой темы и написан псалом

    • velovs@ukr.net | 22 February 2020, 18:50

      В своїх офіційних назвах більшість цих Давньосхідних Церков носять це означення - "православні". І за своїм літургічним обрядом вони також досить близькі до "автентично"

    • Михаил | 22 February 2020, 16:21

      Из года в год, из века в век, порочный принцип торжествует - ворюга и подлец Живут, а тот, кто честен - существует! Увы!

    Most Popular Articles month