Head of UAOC Comments on Transfer of Two Bishops to UOC-KP

7 May 2013, 13:39 | Inter-Orthodox relations | 1 |   | Code for Blog |  | 

Metropolitan Mefodii (Kudriakov) of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church does not view the transfer of Bishops Ioan (Shvets) and Adrian (Kulyk) to the Kyivan Patriarchate as a tragedy. The church simply got rid of a ballast, the Primate said in an interview to Channel 5.

In particular, the metropolitan reminded that Bishop Ioan of the Lviv-Sambir Eparchy of UAOC once was part of the Kyivan Patriarchate and when he expressed a wish to transfer to UAOC, they even doubted if it was worth while admitting him.

“We admitted him, sent him to the Lviv Eparchy and gave him great opportunities. However, during his two years of service, he was not able to establish a single parish. He did not have anything there. He came to us without anything and left with God without anything. I can tell frankly, he did not transfer anyone. For he did not have anything,” he said.

“We say when we admit anyone, and during church life we say: 'If you do not like it, leave with God!' Who needs ballast? Better to have five worthy persons than five hundred who are not sure what they want… The main thing for us is to preserve the ideology of UAOC. For it is the heart of independent Ukraine,” stressed the hierarch.

As he commented on the situation in the Khmelnytsk Eprachy, the Primate said that Bishop Adrian had only a few parishes and, therefore, his transfer will not affect UAOC.

Система Orphus
Rating
0
0
1comments count

comments

add comments 
  • pavloosh | 7 May 2013, 19:40
    comment comment

    Sounds like sour grapes. Toh ne dobre!

Сan leave comments only to registered visitors Еnter

Last comments

  • Fr Jason Charron | 15 December 2014, 20:13

    Thank you, George Weigel, for coming the defense of common sense and to the defense of the overlooked Greek Catholics. May God bless you!

  • Yaroslav Mineyev | 15 December 2014, 09:41

    В тихому омуті, -- душі цього "аскета і молллитовника", -- біси водяться. Цікаво а який компромат має на Онуфрія його пекельна гріховність, преоскверненніший Гундяй? (Нехай доми їх будуть

  • mufti Said | 13 December 2014, 17:35

    Муслім, а у вас совість є? Ну ладно, можливо я і не є авторитетом для кримських мусульман, але казати, що моя посада є фейковою - це непорядно, не єтично та негідно для віруючого.

  • Muslim | 12 December 2014, 21:29

    пан Ісмагілов не є авторитетом для кримських мусульман. Не беручи до уваги його особистість, його посада є абсолютно фейковою. Він не може ані радити, ані наставляти кримських мусульман. До РІСУ: не

  • Yaroslav Mineyev | 9 December 2014, 20:23

    Звісно ж ідеологи єресі "русскага мира" підуть у вічну погибель, де приготоване місце єретику-філетеїсту, Гундяєву (Нехай буде дім його пустим, єпископство його нехай візьме інший,

Last news

Most Popular Articles month