Rep of UOC-KP: Metropolitan Volodymyr Was Confused By Compilers of His Report For Council of ROC

5 February 2013, 09:23 | Interchurch relations | 1 |   | Code for Blog |  | 

The spokesman of the Kyivan Patriarchate, Archbishop Yevstratii (Zoria) said in a commentary to the Orthodox Reviewer that the address, to which Metropolitan Volodymyr referred in his report read out at the Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, never existed in the form in which it was presented by UOC-Moscow Patriarchate. “Unfortunately, whether deliberately or not, the persons who had prepared the report confused both the metropolitan and all the readers or listeners of the report,” he said.

According to the archbishop, “the text mixes up two principally different events which have some similarities, namely, the address of the Holy Synod to the heads of the Local Churches, heads of the Roman Catholic Church and Church of England  and the address to the head of UGCC (Synod Journal 37).”

Archbishop Yevstratii noted that the manipulation of the texts and mixing them up indicate the lack of theological and canonical arguments on the part of the Moscow Patriarchate regarding the “shameful practice of re-baptizing.”

The spokesman of the Kyivan Patriarchate explained that “the two mentioned addresses are mixed up as one and the same thing. The author noticed that there was no responses to the first address even though they were not asked for or expected  by anyone. And this is interpreted by UOC-MP as a support of the shameful practice of “re-baptizing” for some reason. At the same time, the response of the Head of UGCC, which apparently dissatisfied Moscow, is presented as some exception.”

So reported the web site of UOC-KP.

Система Orphus
Rating
0
0
1comments count

comments

add comments 
  • ingvar | 5 February 2013, 14:03
    comment comment

    http://www.andreytkachev.com/vse-my-sovershenno-spokojny-po-povodu-sobora/

Сan leave comments only to registered visitors Еnter

Latest news

Last comments

  • Frank Sysyn | 13 February 2016, 01:24

    I await for those more versed in theological language to make a statement on this. In my reading this is a total victory for Patriarch Kirill and Putin. It will undoubtedly cause consternation among

  • Пан Валерій | 10 February 2016, 14:01

    Дякую за змістовну та розгорнуту відповідь. Тепер Ви мене переконали!

  • Taras Antoshevskyy | 10 February 2016, 13:50

    СПЖ сайт містить дуже багато речей, які вже спростосвано. А щодо Данилевича, вибачте, я маю переказувати Вам всю нашу з ним "співпрацю"? Не збираюся. Бо не маю ні часу, ні бажання.

  • Пан Валерій | 10 February 2016, 13:40

    Сподіваюсь пане Тарасе, Вам, як серйозній та авторитетній людині не важко буде навести конкретні приклади брехні від Данилевича та СПЖ. Інакше Ваші слова виглядатимуть, як би це толерантніше сказати,

  • Taras Antoshevskyy | 10 February 2016, 13:14

    Я не упереджений щодо УПЦ - її тепер МП затискає. Я терпіти не можу очевидної брехні від відділу Данилевича (якого особисто ловив на неправді і маніпуляціях) і СПЖ (цієї дочки російської пропаганди).

Most Popular Articles month